Learning endotracheal intubation with the Video Endotracheal Tube Guide

Claudio Luciano Franck, Ana Carolina de Oliveira, Bruna Corchak da Silva

Abstract

Introduction

Video laryngoscopes facilitate the visualization of the glottis but do not guarantee endotracheal intubation due to difficulties in guiding the endotracheal tube to the airway. The video endotracheal tube guide (VETG), inserted into the lumen of the endotracheal tube, provides images of its progression and assists in guiding it to the airway.

Objectives

To analyze the learning of endotracheal intubation among medical students using the VETG.

Methodology

A cross-sectional, observational, analytical study of differences in learning endotracheal intubation in simulation mannequins with direct laryngoscopy, with or without the VETG, in two groups of medical students during and after a demonstration lecture. Data on the procedures and responses from the questionnaire were collected and analyzed using the Student’s t-test and chi-square test.

Results

Fifty-one medical students participated in the demonstration lecture, of whom 37 practiced endotracheal intubation in simulation mannequins—18 using direct laryngoscopy alone and 19 with the assistance of the VETG. During the demonstration lecture, the percentage of students visualizing the epiglottis, vallecula, and vocal cords was higher with the VETG (P 0.000053). In the practical session, the time to visualize the epiglottis (P < 0.0029) and complete the intubation (p=0.0006) was shorter with the VETG on the second attempt. The success rate of intubation on the first attempt was higher with the VETG (P = 0.002). The percentage of visualization of anatomical structures was greater with the VETG on both the first (P 0.067) and second attempts (P = 0.038).

Conclusion

Learning endotracheal intubation with the VETG appears promising, as it facilitates the demonstration of anatomical structures by the instructor and increases the percentage of correct intubations and the visualization of anatomical structures by medical students in a shorter time.

Keywords: Endotracheal intubation, Video, VETG, Technique, Learning

References

1. Griesdale DE, Bosma TL, Kurth T, et al. Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Medicine 2008; 34(10):1835-1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1205-6 PMid:18604519

2. Aghamohammadi H, Massoudi N, Fathi M, et al. Intubation learning curve: comparison between video and direct laryngoscopy by inexperienced students. J Med Life 2015; 8(4):150-153.

3. Noppens RR, Geimer S, Eisel N, et al. Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® videolaryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective, comparative study in the ICU. Critical Care 2012; 16(3):R103. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11384 PMid:22695007 PMCid:PMC3580658

4. Badia M, Montserrat N, Serviá L, et al. Severe complications in orotracheal intubation in intensive care: observational study and risk factor analysis. Med Intensiva 2015; 39(1):26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2014.01.003 PMid:24612759

5. Mort T. The incidence and risk factors for cardiac arrest during emergency tracheal intubation: A justification for incorporating the ASA Guidelines in remote locations. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16(7):508-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.01.007 PMid:15590254

6. Smith TL, Van Meter J. Maximizing success with rapid sequence intubations. Adv Emerg Nurs J 2018; 40(3):183-193. https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0000000000000204 PMid:30059373

7. Sakles JC, Mick NW, III CAB. Walls Manual of Emergency Airway Management. 5th ed. Wolters kluwer, New york, 2019.

8. Yong SA, Chaou CH, Yu SR, et al. Video-assisted laryngoscope facilitates intubation skill learning in the emergency department. J Acute Med 2020; 10(2):60-69.

9. Choo HJ, Kwon OY, Ko YG. Educational suitability of endotracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope. Korean J Med Educ. 2015; 27(4):267-274. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2015.27.4.267 PMid:26657548 PMCid:PMC8814511

10. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, Savoldelli GL, et al. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116(5):670-679. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew058 PMid:27106971

11. Malito ML, Mathias LA da ST, Kimura Junior A, et al. The impact of introducing a videolaryngoscope in the initial training of laryngoscopy for undergraduate medical students: a simulation randomized trial. Braz J Anesthesiol 2023; 73(5):532-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.048 PMid:33823211

12. Opolski IJ, Sousa SdR, Franck CL. Analysis of the 3D printing open-source video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation. J Mech Vent 2023; 4(1):10-17. https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10070

13. Chao A, Chou WH, Han Bin Huang, et al. Evaluation of tracheal intubation: A retrospective study of skill acquisition by medical students in the operating theater. J Formos Med Assoc 2015; 114(9):855-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2013.07.019 PMid:24017969

14. Haddad F, Trabelsi Y, Jebri A, et al. The benefits of the video-laryngoscope in learning intubation for undergraduate medical students: A randomized crossover study in airway manikins. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2023; 53:101313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2023.101313

15. Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, et al. The importance of first-pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20(1):71-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12055 PMid:23574475 PMCid:PMC4530518