Electrical Impedance Tomography: the future of mechanical ventilation?

Melina Simonpietri, Mia Shokry, Ehab G. Daoud

Abstract

Electrical Impedance Tomography is a rapidly evolving technology used for bedside lung imaging. Although EIT devices have been commercially available for the past decade, they are still not commonly used in everyday clinical practice. EIT has multiple benefits over standard chest imaging techniques; it is non-invasive, it can be used at bedside and it allows continuous monitoring of the patient’s condition.

EIT can change the standard practice for monitoring lung function and caring for patients on mechanical ventilation.

In this concise review, we will discuss the general concepts of EIT and its clinical applications. As this technology keeps developing and becomes more available for clinical use, it might revolutionize the way we practice mechanical ventilation.

Additional studies need to be performed to compare its benefits to our current practice.

Keywords

EIT, Mechanical ventilation, PEEP, Overdistention, Ventilator induced lung injury

References

1. Stefan MS, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in the United States, 2001 to 2009: a national survey. J Hosp Med 2013; 8(2):76-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2004 PMid:23335231 PMCid:PMC3565044

2. Qadir N, Mathew R. Imaging of the Critically Ill Patient: Radiology. In: Oropello JM, Pastores SM, Kvetan V. eds. Critical Care. McGraw-Hill; Accessed May 08, 2021.

3. Danish M, Agarwal A, Goyal P, et al. Diagnostic Performance of 6-Point Lung Ultrasound in ICUPatients: A Comparison with Chest X-Ray and CT Thorax. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2019;47(4):307-319.

4. Costa, Eduardo, Lima, Raul, Amato, Marcelo. Electrical impedance tomography. Curr Opin Crit Care 2009; 15(1):18-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283220e8c PMid:19186406

5. Leonhardt S, Lachmann B. Electrical impedance tomography: the holy grail of ventilation and perfusion monitoring? Intensive Care Med 2012; 38(12):1917-1929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2684-z PMid:22992946

6. Adler A, Amyot R, Guardo R, et al. Monitoring changes in lung air and liquid volumes with electrical impedance tomography. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83:1762-1767. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1997.83.5.1762 PMid:9375349

7. Hinz J, Hahn G, Neumann P, et al. End-expiratory lung impedance change enables bedside monitoringof end-expiratory lung volume change. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:37-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1555-4 PMid:12528020

8. Lobo B, Hermosa C, Abella A, Gordo F. Electrical impedance tomography. Ann Transl Med 2018;6(2):26. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.12.06 PMid:29430443 PMCid:PMC5799136

9. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Quintel M, et al. Regional physiology of ARDS. Crit Care 2017; 21:312. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1905-9 PMid:29297365 PMCid:PMC5751536

10. Lehmann S, Leonhardt S, Ngo C, et al. Electrical impedance tomography as possible guidance for individual positioning of patients with multiple lung injury. Clin Respir J 2018; 12(1):68-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12481 PMid:27058971

11. Tomasino S, Sassanelli R, Marescalco C, et al. Electrical Impedance Tomography and Prone Position During Ventilation in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Case Reports and a Brief Literature Review. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 24(4):287-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089253220958912 PMid:32924792

12. Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, et al. Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2006; 354(17):1775-1786. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052052 PMid:16641394

13. Hess DR. Recruitment Maneuvers and PEEP Titration. Respir Care 2015; 60(11):1688-1704. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04409 PMid:26493593

14. Daoud EG, Shimabukuro R. Mechanical ventilation for the non-critical care trained practitioner. Part 1. J Mech Vent 2020; 1(2):39-51. https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10011

15. Sahetya SK, Goligher EC, Brower RG. Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Setting Positive EndExpiratory Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195(11):1429-1438. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201610-2035CI PMid:28146639 PMCid:PMC5470753

16. Beitler JR, Malhotra A, Thompson BT. Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Clin Chest Med 2016; 37(4):633-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2016.07.004 PMid:27842744 PMCid:PMC5131805

17. Frerichs I, Hinz J, Herrmann P, et al. Regional lung perfusion as determined by electrical impedance tomography in comparison with electron beam CT imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002; 21(6):646-652. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2002.800585 PMid:12166861 PMCid:PMC7186030

18. Bluth T, Kiss T, Kircher M, et al. Measurement of relative lung perfusion with electrical impedance and positron emission tomography: an experimentalcomparative study in pigs. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123(2):246-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.056 PMid:31160064 PMCid:PMC6676171

19. Nguyen DT, Chik W, Kosobrodov R, et al. Pulmonary embolism detection with electrical impedance tomography. Heart, Lung and Circulation 2013; 22: S192-S193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2013.05.459

20. Arad M, Zlochiver S, Davidson T, et al. The detection of pleural effusion using a parametric EIT technique. Physiol Meas 2009; 30(4):421-428. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/30/4/006 PMid:19332893

21. Costa EL, Chaves CN, Gomes S, et al. Real-time detection of pneumothorax using electricalimpedance tomography. Crit Care Med 2008; 36(4):1230-1238. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a0380 PMid:18379250

22. Hochhausen N, Dohmeier H, Rossaint R, et al.Monitoring of cardiac output and lung ventilation byElectrical Impedance Tomography in a porcine model of acute lung injury. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2017; 2017:352-355. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8036835 PMid:29059883

23. Steinmann D, Engehausen M, Stiller B, et al. Electrical impedance tomography for verification of correct endotracheal tube placement in pediatric patients: a feasibility study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57(7):881-887. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12143 PMid:23750708