Application of the prone position during COVID-19 pandemic (PROCOV). An international survey of clinicians

Kevin Benavente, Stephanie Yoshimura, James Davis, Achal Dhupa, Ehab Daoud

Abstract

Background

Benefits of the prone position in ARDS are well established, and the evidence of its benefits for the COVID-19 patients are growing. However, the clinical utilization of such a maneuver is less established. We attempted to analyze the clinician’s utilization and attitude of the prone position and what is the main drive for its usage. 

Methods

An international survey of eight questions. The questionnaire was anonymous and included the country of practice, percentage of patients with COVID-19 they have placed in the prone position while undergoing mechanical ventilation, most important factor that determined the need for the prone position (SpO₂, PaO₂:FiO₂, FIO₂, PEEP), duration of prone position in hours/day, use of neuro-muscular blocking agents, body position (flat, trendelenburg, reverse trendelenburg), the use of a specific protocol for the prone position, if they believe that prone position is beneficial, and if their practice will change or not. The survey was active for five months.

Statistical analysis included frequencies of each response, as well as subgroup analyses designed to identify potential correlates of longer or shorter proning durations. The questionnaire assessed clinicians optimism regarding the continuing use of proning in the future, and how different cutoffs for proning initiation may be associated with attitudes towards proning. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results are expressed in Means ± Standard Deviation (SD)

Results

294 questionnaires were collected from 35 countries with 78% of responders from the USA. Median duration of proning was 14.8 ± 2.8 hours per day. 74% of clinicians utilized an established protocol for proning their patients. The decision to initiate proning was non-significant and split between the use of oxygen saturation SpO₂ (30%) mean 92.44 ± 5.61, PaO₂:FiO₂ ratio (28%) mean 188.44 ± 57.36, FiO₂ mean 78.6 ± 15.65, PEEP mean 12.96 ± 4.66, or immediate prone positioning following intubation (22%).

41.2% of surveyed utilize the prone position in 25-50%, average percent patients proned calculated at 7.1%. Estimated 77% of respondents reported prone positioning to be helpful in 50% or less of cases. 91% of responders used NMB either always or frequently, and there was statistical significance between the use of NMB and perceived benefits of proning (P < 0.001). 74% of those surveyed use a protocol for proning, the use of protocol and the perceived benefits of proning was statistically significant (P <0.001).

Conclusion  

There are few agreements between clinicians on the duration of the proning sessions and use of NMB and using a protocol for proning. There was no agreement on the trigger of the prone position or the belief of its usefulness. This ambiguity should trigger an evidence-based ARDS management using the prone position in COVID-19 patients. Keywords: Prone position, COVID-19, ARDS, Survey, Neuromuscular blockers

Keywords

Prone position, COVID-19, ARDS, Survey, Neuromuscular blockers

References

1. Piehl MA, Brown RS. Use of extreme position changes in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 1976; 4(1):13-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-197601000-00003 PMid:1253612  2. Douglas WW, Rehder K, Beynen FM, et al. Improved oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory failure: the prone position. Am Rev Respir Dis 1977; 115(4):559-566.  3. Gattinoni L, Tognoni G, Pesenti A, et al. Prone-supine study group. Effect of prone positioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:568-573. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010043 PMid:11529210  4. Guérin C, Gaillard S, Lemasson S, et al. Effects of systematic prone positioning in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 292:2379-2387. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.19.2379 PMid:15547166  5. Mancebo J, Fernández R, Blanch L, et al. A multicenter trial of prolonged prone ventilation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173:1233-1239. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200503-353OC PMid:16556697  6 . Taccone P, Pesenti A, Latini R, et al. Prone-Supine II Study Group. Prone positioning in patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009; 302:1977-1984. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1614 PMid:19903918  7 . Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al. PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2159-2168. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1214103 PMid:23688302  8 . Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2021; 49(11):e1063-e1143.   DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337 PMID: 34605781 9 . Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, et al. American Thoracic Society, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and Society of Critical Care Medicine. Mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195(9):1253-1263. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST PMid:28459336  10 . Gattinoni L, Taccone P, Carlesso E, et al. Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Rationale, indications, and limits. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188(11):1286-1293. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201308-1532CI PMid:24134414  11. Kallet RH. A Comprehensive Review of Prone Position in ARDS. Respir Care 2015, 60 (11) 1660-1687. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04271 PMid:26493592  12. Guérin C, Albert RK, Beitler J, et al. Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46(12):2385-2396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06306-w PMid:33169218 PMCid:PMC7652705  13. Langer T, Brioni M, Guzzardella A, et al. PRONA-COVID Group. Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multi-centric study of more than 1000 patients. Crit Care 2021; 25(1):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03552-2 PMid:33823862 PMCid:PMC8022297  14. COVID-ICU Group on behalf of the REVA Network and the COVID-ICU investigators. Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47(1):60-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06294-x PMid:33211135 PMCid:PMC7674575  15. Gürün Kaya A, Öz M, Erol S, et al. Prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19. Tuberk Toraks 2020; 68(3):331-336. https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.70164 PMid:33295732  16. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 2016; 315(8):788-800. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0291 PMid:26903337  17. Patel BV, Haar S, Handslip R, et al; United Kingdom COVID-ICU National Service Evaluation. Natural history, trajectory, and management of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the United Kingdom. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47(5):549-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06389-z PMid:33974106 PMCid:PMC8111053  18. D’Souza FR, Murray JP, Tummala S, et al. Implementation and assessment of a proning protocol for nonintubated patients with COVID-19. J Healthc Qual 2021; 43(4):195-203. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000305 PMid:34180868 PMCid:PMC8260339  19. Mathews KS, Soh H, Shaefi S, et al. STOP-COVID Investigators. Prone positioning and survival in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019-related respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2021; 49(7):1026-1037. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004938 PMid:33595960 PMCid:PMC8277560  20. Douglas IS, Rosenthal CA, Swanson DD, et al. Safety and outcomes of prolonged usual care prone position mechanical ventilation to treat acute coronavirus disease 2019 hypoxemic respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2021; 49(3):490-502. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004818 PMid:33405409  21. Buonsenso D, De Rose C, Pierantoni L. Doctors’ shortage in adults COVID-19 units: a call for pediatricians. Eur J Pediatr 2021; 180(7):2315-2318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-03995-3 PMid:33594541 PMCid:PMC7885982  22. Tabah A, Ramanan M, Laupland KB, et al. PPE-SAFE contributors. Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): An international survey. J Crit Care 2020; 59:70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.06.005 PMid:32570052 PMCid:PMC7293450  23 . Le MQ, Rosales R, Shapiro LT, et al. The down side of prone positioning: The case of a coronavirus 2019 survivor. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.2020; 99(10):870-872. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001530 PMid:32657818 PMCid:PMC7375183  24. https://www.pennmedicine.org/news/news-releases/2020/october/increasing-education-prone-positioning-could-increase-use-among-those-caring-covid19-patients.  25. Cotton S, Husain AA, Meehan M, et al. The influence of paralytics on the safety and efficacy of prone positioning in COVID19 ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203(9): A2508. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccmconference.2021.203.1_MeetingAbstracts.A2508 2 6. Gattinoni L, Marini JJ. Prone positioning and neuromuscular blocking agents are part of standard care in severe ARDS patients: we are not sure. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:2201-2203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4040-6 PMid:26399892  27. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2018; 46(9):e825-e873.  DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299 PMID: 30113379 28. Murray MJ, DeBlock H, Erstad B, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for sustained neuromuscular blockade in the adult critically ill patient. Crit Care Med 2016 ;44(11):2079-2103. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002027 PMid:27755068  29 . Robak O, Schellongowski P, Bojic A, et al. Short-term effects of combining upright and prone positions in patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2011; 15(5):R230. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10471 PMid:21955757 PMCid:PMC3334777  30 . Niël-Weise BS, Gastmeier P, Kola A et al. An evidence based recommendation on bed head elevation for mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2011; 15:R111. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10135 PMid:21481251 PMCid:PMC3219392  31 . Su M, Yamasaki K, Daoud EG. Effect of trendelenburg position during prone ventilation in fifteen COVID-19 patients. Observational study. J Mech Vent 2021; 2(4):125-130. https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10035  32 . Lu, X., Jiang, L., Chen, T. et al. Continuously available ratio of SpO2/FiO2 serves as a noninvasive prognostic marker for intensive care patients with COVID-19. Respir Res 2020; 21:194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01455-4 PMid:32698822 PMCid:PMC7374662