Prognostic variables and decannulation of tracheostomy in the long term acute care environment: a case for clinician driven decision making

Kimberly A. Weil, Vanessa Baumann, Brittany Brown, Rebecca Nadeau, Brett Gerstenhaber, Edward P. Manning

Abstract

Purpose

Tracheostomy is a necessary procedure required for prolonged mechanical ventilation in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACH). Many factors influence successful decannulation, or tracheostomy removal, and it is unclear what factors are essential for determining decannulation. The purpose of this study was to determine retrospective performance of single prognostic variables for successful decannulation, like peak expiratory flow measurement, overnight oximetry testing, and blood gas analysis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a three-year period to investigate the association between peak flow (PF) measurements ≥160 L/min, successful overnight oximetry (ONO), sex, and decannulation success. Average PF measurements, arterial blood gas (ABG), days on mechanical ventilation, LTACH length of stay (LOS), and age were also investigated.

Results

We examined the records of 135 patients, 127 of which were successfully decannulated. PF measurements ≥160 L/min (P 0.16), sex (P <0.05) and passing ONO (P <0.05) were significantly different between successfully and unsuccessfully decannulated patients; mean ABG (PH, PaCO₂, PaO₂), mechanical ventilation days, LOS, and age were not significantly different (P >0.05).

Conclusions

These results suggest no single prognostic variable can predict decannulation outcomes. Rather, clinical judgment of experienced medical professionals appears sufficient to achieve a 94% decannulation success rate. Additional investigation is required to determine what metrics are necessary, or if clinical judgment alone can predict decannulation success.

Keywords

Tracheostomy decannulation, long-term acute care facility, peak expiratory flow measurement

References

1. Sanchez-Guerrero JA, Guerlain J, Cebrià I Iranzo MA, et al. Expiratory airflow obstruction due to tracheostomy tube: A spirometric study in 50 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2020; 45(5):703-709. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13561 PMid:32351009

2. Hernández G, Ortiz R, Pedrosa A, et al. The indication of tracheotomy conditions the predictors of time to decannulation in critical patients. Med Intensiva 2012; 36(8):531-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2012.01.010 PMid:22398327

3. Diaz-Ballve L, Villalba D, Andreu M, et al. Respiratory muscle strength and state of consciousness values measured prior to the decanulation in different levels of complexity. A longitudinal prospective case series study. Medicina Intensiva (Engl Ed) 2019; 43(5):270-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2019.04.001

4. Bach J. Indications for tracheostomy and decannulation of tracheostomized ventilator users. Monaldi archives for chest disease. Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace 1995; 50(3):223-227.

5. Bach JR, Martinez D. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: continuous noninvasive ventilatory support prolongs survival. Respire care 2011; 56(6):744-750. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.00831 PMid:21333078

6. Lee BB, Boswell-Ruys C, Butler JE, et al. Surface functional electrical stimulation of the abdominal muscles to enhance cough and assist tracheostomy decannulation after high-level spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31(1):78-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2008.11753985 PMid:18533416 PMCid:PMC2435038

7. Kang SW, Choi WA, Won YH, et al. Clinical implications of assisted peak cough flow measured with an external glottic control device for tracheostomy decannulation in patients with neuromuscular diseases and cervical spinal cord injuries: A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97(9):1509-1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.023 PMid:27001502

8. Guerlain J, Guerrero JA, Baujat B, et al. Peak inspiratory flow is a simple means of predicting decannulation success following head and neck cancer surgery: a prospective study of fifty-six patients. Laryngoscope 2015; 125(2):365-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24904 PMid:25180960

9. Enrichi C, Battel I, Zanetti C, et al. Clinical criteria for tracheostomy decannulation in subjects with acquired brain injury. Respir Care 2017; 62(10):1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05470 PMid:28698267

10. Winck JC, LeBlanc C, Soto JL, et al. The value of cough peak flow measurements in the assessment of extubation or decannulation readiness. Rev Port Pneumol (2006) 2015; 21(2):94-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2014.12.002 PMid:25926373

11. Lesnik M, J Sanchez-Guerrero J, De Crouy Chanel O, et al. Peak inspiratory flow as predictor for tracheotomy. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2018; 135(1):3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2017.06.009 PMid:28673655

12. Park MK, Lee SJ. Changes in swallowing and cough functions among stroke patients before and after tracheostomy decannulation. Dysphagia 2018; 33(6):857-865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9920-9 PMid:29915928

13. Grevelding P, Hrdlicka HC, Holland S, et al. Patient outcomes and lessons learned from treating patients with severe COVID-19 at a long-term acute care hospital: Single-center retrospective study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022; 9(1):e31502 https://doi.org/10.2196/31502 PMid:35023835 PMCid:PMC8834875